A liberal talk radio host had an interesting conversation on 8/22 in regards to the demonic practice of eugenics. (I won’t bother linking to him.) Of course, they would never admit that this is what they were truly talking about. His conversation with a female guest centered around forced vasectomies for male children, as a possible solution to the abortion dilemma.

This guest, evidently an esteemed female professional in the field of psychology, was reasoning that since our children are going to have sex anyways, why not target vasectomies at boys who were in groups that would be likely to start fornicating at a young age? After all, if these teenage boys can’t get their girlfriends pregnant, there would be fewer abortions, right?

The host not only agreed with her, but suggested that rather than wait until the boys were 12, why not simply give them a vasectomy when they go in for their circumcision?

Every decision that man makes is an ethical decision. The question is, whose ethics are we to use? For the second time in our history since the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of the Species, or the Preservation Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, the scientific community is preaching that we should start castrating black men. Not only that, they want to start doing it when they’re babies, with the noble goal of preventing abortions in the future.

This is, of course, an ethical decision according to a scientific worldview. It is a decision that has been given much thought, and the scientific/psychology field has come to a conclusion, and made an ethical decision. Here is the chain of logic they’re following:

Abortions are bad. We don’t know why they’re bad, because it’s a woman’s private choice, but we’ve decided they’re bad. (Unless someone wants to prevent an abortion, in which case abortion is good, and we’ll defend that “right to choose” ’til our dying breath.) Hereby having decided by a consensus that abortions are bad (except for when they’re good), we must now prevent abortions, while preserving the right to have one. To do that, we must prevent pregnancy. Forced vasectomies on male infants (selected by the scientific community based on their likelihood to be promiscuous – said promiscuity which cannot be prevented in the males of this animal species) is the most likely method to prevent abortions. While we’re at it, let’s give all the baby girls their Gardisil shot. Begin!

What they’re not saying in their argument is that there are more abortions performed among minority communities, and thus, we’re back to castrating black and Hispanic males. This is an ethical argument that they are making, but it is an ethic that is rooted in the religion of science, which is controlled by a priesthood of wicked and depraved men and women.

To paraphrase RJ Rushdoony, God requires the whole man in order to be of service to Him. Deuteronomy 23:1 states, “He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.”

Christians cannot sit silently while these ethical issues come up. We have to be prepared with an answer as the “solutions” to problems from the secular religions become more and more demonic. History is repeating itself before our very eyes, and yet the church is strangely silent. The Word of God sets an ethical standard that is unwavering, if we are not so cowardly as to cast it aside.

The “seminaries” in America are cranking out more “pastors” than at any time in history, and yet where are the men? How are you going to respond to these monsters? These “scientists” want to castrate little baby boys. Your response to the scientific community cannot be “God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life!” We must be armed with Scripture to respond to the attacks that are going to come against the church.

I realize the pre-mil theologians will want to sit on the sidelines, waiting for Christ to come back and fix this. In the meantime, what is your response to this when policies begin to be enacted? What will your response be when they come to you with their ethical argument that it’s “for the children”? What will be your ethical response when they say it’s to prevent abortions? What will you say, Christian, when they come for your sons?